CMS may impose minimum provider-network standards for ACA plans
By Bob Herman and Virgil Dickson
November 20, 2015 - Modern Healthcare
The CMS has proposed mandating minimum
network standards for health plans sold on the federal insurance marketplace in
2017 as part of an effort to handle the broad shift toward narrow provider
networks.
The Affordable Care Act requires that all medical policies on
the exchanges have enough in-network hospitals and doctors for members so that
gall services will be accessible without unreasonable delay.h In addition,
ACA-compliant plan networks must update their provider directories monthly and
include at least 30% of essential providers.
However, the 381-page
proposed rule (PDF) released Friday goes a step further, asking states to
establish a quantitative measure to ensure ACA policyholders have sufficient
access to healthcare providers. If states don't choose a standard, the CMS
proposed a default setting that would measure network adequacy by maximum travel
times or distances to providers. Those minimum criteria would be established at
a later date, the agency said.
gHHS would discuss with states their
selection in advance of the start of the certification cycle to determine
whether the state's network adequacy standard would be acceptable,h the proposed
rule states. gWe would thereafter notify issuers via subregulatory guidance
whether the state standards or federal default standards apply.h
More
health insurers
have built narrow-network products as a means to control costs. People who
select plans with a more limited set of providers generally have lower monthly
premiums compared with those who choose broader network plans. But narrower
networks have raised the ire of many patients across the country, some of whom
have been confused of which hospitals and doctors are actually considered
in-network.
The network adequacy proposal is a departure from the model
legislation drafted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners,
which is expected to be ratified this weekend. The NAIC draft does not mandate
those quantitative standards and instead leaves it up to state insurance
regulators. Consumer groups have urged tighter standards like what CMS is
proposing.
gWe will continue to monitor the NAIC work and look forward
to partnering with states and the NAIC in developing and promulgating network
adequacy protections,h the CMS said. gIn the interest of furthering this work,
we are proposing standards related to network adequacy c but will take into
consideration the NAIC's final recommendation as we assess these
policies.h
Other major components of the rule include the actual
open-enrollment period for 2017. It will run from Nov. 1, 2016, through Jan. 31,
2017, according to the proposal. The CMS reverted back to that time period
because it more closely overlaps with the annual enrollment periods for Medicare
and employer-sponsored coverage.
Further, the CMS said it was seeking
comment and data from stakeholders about the ACA's special-enrollment period,
which allows people to enroll in coverage outside of the open enrollment if they
have some kind of major life event, such as having a child. Insurers have
complained that people are abusing this option, allowing them to hop on and off
exchange coverage based on their health status.
The CMS wants to make
health plan shopping easier for individuals and proposed more "standardized
options" for each metal tier. For example, all 2017 bronze options would have a
$6,650 deductible, all 2017 silver plans would have a $3,500 deductible and all
2017 gold plans would have a $1,250 deductible. Currently, deductibles and other
cost-sharing mechanisms can vary widely within each metal tier, and this would
simplify those options for consumers.
gThat's something today we've only
seen in state-based exchanges,h Elizabeth Carpenter, a vice president at
consulting firm Avalere Health, said of the proposed standardized options. gThis
would make it more like the California or New York models where there are a set
of benefits that are the same.h
The Obama administration is also looking
to entice more people to use the small business health options program, also
known as the SHOP exchanges. Starting Jan. 1, 2017, the CMS proposed employers
would be able to offer all plans across all levels of coverage from one
insurance company. Right now, employers participating in the federal SHOP
marketplace can offer their employees either one health plan and/or one dental
plan, or all health and dental plans across one metal level.
gWe
anticipate that this vertical choice option would be appealing to employers
because it gives employees greater flexibility across coverage levels,h the
agency said.
The change could also be a boon for payers. By offering
multiple plans to an employer, the insurer may be more likely to enroll a
greater share of the employer's group.
In addition, HHS proposed the
federal SHOP begin sending advance notices to qualified employees before their
dependents age off of their plan at age 26. This notice would be sent 90 days in
advance of the date when the child dependent enrollee is no longer eligible for
coverage.
On the cost-sharing front, HHS is proposing an out-of-pocket
annual limit of $7,150 for individuals, up from $6,850 in 2016, and $14,300 a
year for families, which is up from next year's rate of $13,700.
A summary
of the proposed rule can be found on the CMS website. Comments are due by
Dec. 21.